On jab truth, alt media is flooded with nonsense about AI, 5G and gene editing and is not looking at what is in the vial, in the blood and in the corpses.
The KEY in all of this is proving that there is no mRNA in the vials, or if there is in some occasionally, that it is totally truncated, broken down and dysfunctional.
If there is no functional mRNA in the vials, there is no SARS Cov2 'virus' period. It would not make sense to attempt to make mRNA jabs with the goal of goading body cells to make spike protein unless you believed (or falsely tried to lead people to believe) that the virus exists.
If you were lying and trying to make people believe that "mRNA makes antibodies to combat SARS Cov2", the mRNA would be a total subterfuge to distract us from the truth, which is that SARS Cov2 does not exist, and that the jabs are Trojan Horse injections disguised as a BIOLOGICAL emblem (VACCINE) of Troy (VIROLOGY) that are directly poisoning us with CHEMICAL warriors, not BIOLOGICAL ones (Antibodies). [sorry for caps, no italics here].
This debate is similar to 911 where aluminum tubes called airplanes were supposedly deployed to penetrate and demolish steel-concrete buildings, or disappear in a small hole in the Pentagram or in a field in Pennsylvania. The planes were the Trojan horse for disguised missiles to initiate a controlled demolition.
Again: no mRNA = no virus = chemical genocide (+ possible electromagnetic linkage to 5G)
Del Bigtree and Mercola are also part of the problem. But I kind of pardon Del for his previous work on vaccines, even though he still promotes the idea that not only are there viruses but that we could conceivably develop a "safe" vaccine if we just do the "science".
You are right in general and in most of the specifics. Todd Callender's claims, for example, were pretty wild and unsupported from what I can tell. But you may have gone a bit far. CHD, for example, seems quite reliable. If you take issue with the fact that they always assume that viruses exist, well, I am with you. However, within that framework, they provide a lot of useful info.
But I am glad you wrote this because it is becoming a problem that people are believing everything that comes from what they consider the "truther" side. Thanks.
First, yeah the peg breastmilk makes no sense. The jabs have peg but it's such a small amount that would pretty much be super diluted in the milk.
Second, we don't need to see the peg in the milk to harm the baby. The women who got the clot shot have their organs inundated with lipids, as we saw in the Japanese study. That alone is enough to damage milk production. It's the toxins, but the idiots claim the spike protein or other fictional causes. They forget that moderna had issues with this gene therapy before con-vid, as the lipids would cause issues after multiple doses.
Same issue with past vaccines, toxins in the adjuvants and preservatives cause damage. Not what the delusional Brian Hooker of CHD said in an interview with Steve kirsch: that his kid got a measles infection of the gut which helped cause autism. No, you moron, you know there was mercury and other toxins in the MMR shots and somehow you ignore that in favor of bullshit measles?
It's beyond idiotic these days, where even those who question the shots forget why the shots are really damaging- the mother fking toxicity, not the made up lore that matches broken ass immune "science". Ignoring the elephant in the room, they keep on repeating the bullshit that got us in this mess of vaccination in the first place.
Yes I think its good, you have pointed out some controlled opposition agents, they can be frustrating as so many people follow them (with their classic non sequiturs, " viruses" and just plain lies).
The Dr Baileys are always solid with science and good ones to recommend.
I get the frustration, but may I suggest that your title be trashed & burned? "Misinformation" is for each of us to decide for ourselves, and what's misinformation to me is someone else's truth to die for. "Out of control" suggests that there should be control. Nope. Let's please not encourage any tyrant fantasies about controlling others' speech.
Obviously we have a huge problem in that people increasingly don't know how to, or have any interest in learning, how to reason. So they are fertile ground for any and every fantasy that comes down the pike that affirms their fears & beliefs. This is what the education systems are designed to produce. Without reasoning ability, it's emotions that decide truth. The unfortunate reality is that what will restore personal responsibility for reasoning is people being brutalized by charlatans. When they've had enough, they might decide to step up and become a bit harder to fool.
Naomi Wolf's recent piece on the mRNA in the jabs presents the same issue as your other examples. I wrote a rather lengthy reply pointing out that we don't actually know they contain any mRNA, and asking why anyone is believing anything the pharma companies or 'health authorities' are saying is in the jabs, especially considering all of the lies and cover-ups since 2020. Pretty much crickets was the response.
On a recent Igor Chudov post discussing a recent published paper that reported finding mRNA from the jabs in breast milk, I read the paper and then pointed out in the comments why the lab methods don't actually prove the conclusion. Again, crickets.
This same refusal to engage in real debate and learn is happening everywhere. And I don't blame just the writers, because we're proving that their audiences too don't really want to know the truth, they want to know what's comfortable given their current beliefs.
I don't know if you saw the interview of Bigtree by Derrick Broze, but it was interesting. Broze asked him why he doesn't address the virus isolation issue, and he suggested that he thinks people aren't ready to hear it. I think he was playing to who he thought the audience would be, and I'm not convinced that he understands the virus isolation issue. I think when you're very successful and have a huge following, like he and RFK, you stick with the proven formula, and don't give your attention to things that have an air of being disruptive. The virus isolation issue is major disruption.
Everyone wants stability, and is comfortable with what they perceive as the 'knowns', and it's actually a rare person who dives into the unknown looking for their 'knowns' to be shattered. Therefore, sharing truths that expose sacred lies and superstitions will always be a lonely business.
Great article, thank you.
The KEY in all of this is proving that there is no mRNA in the vials, or if there is in some occasionally, that it is totally truncated, broken down and dysfunctional.
If there is no functional mRNA in the vials, there is no SARS Cov2 'virus' period. It would not make sense to attempt to make mRNA jabs with the goal of goading body cells to make spike protein unless you believed (or falsely tried to lead people to believe) that the virus exists.
If you were lying and trying to make people believe that "mRNA makes antibodies to combat SARS Cov2", the mRNA would be a total subterfuge to distract us from the truth, which is that SARS Cov2 does not exist, and that the jabs are Trojan Horse injections disguised as a BIOLOGICAL emblem (VACCINE) of Troy (VIROLOGY) that are directly poisoning us with CHEMICAL warriors, not BIOLOGICAL ones (Antibodies). [sorry for caps, no italics here].
This debate is similar to 911 where aluminum tubes called airplanes were supposedly deployed to penetrate and demolish steel-concrete buildings, or disappear in a small hole in the Pentagram or in a field in Pennsylvania. The planes were the Trojan horse for disguised missiles to initiate a controlled demolition.
Again: no mRNA = no virus = chemical genocide (+ possible electromagnetic linkage to 5G)
https://www.globalresearch.ca/expert-report-fifth-generation-5g-directed-energy-radiation-emissions-context-nanometal-contaminated-vaccines-include-covid-19-graphite-ferrous-oxide-antennas/5786727
Marc Mullie MD
Del Bigtree and Mercola are also part of the problem. But I kind of pardon Del for his previous work on vaccines, even though he still promotes the idea that not only are there viruses but that we could conceivably develop a "safe" vaccine if we just do the "science".
another problem is the misunderstanding about antibodies, which do not make someone immune nor anything like it https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/to-be-well-studied-one-must-read
Jo
You are right in general and in most of the specifics. Todd Callender's claims, for example, were pretty wild and unsupported from what I can tell. But you may have gone a bit far. CHD, for example, seems quite reliable. If you take issue with the fact that they always assume that viruses exist, well, I am with you. However, within that framework, they provide a lot of useful info.
But I am glad you wrote this because it is becoming a problem that people are believing everything that comes from what they consider the "truther" side. Thanks.
This post should go viral. The rest of the alt media needs to hear this. I am spamming this all over bitchute.
Good points.
First, yeah the peg breastmilk makes no sense. The jabs have peg but it's such a small amount that would pretty much be super diluted in the milk.
Second, we don't need to see the peg in the milk to harm the baby. The women who got the clot shot have their organs inundated with lipids, as we saw in the Japanese study. That alone is enough to damage milk production. It's the toxins, but the idiots claim the spike protein or other fictional causes. They forget that moderna had issues with this gene therapy before con-vid, as the lipids would cause issues after multiple doses.
Same issue with past vaccines, toxins in the adjuvants and preservatives cause damage. Not what the delusional Brian Hooker of CHD said in an interview with Steve kirsch: that his kid got a measles infection of the gut which helped cause autism. No, you moron, you know there was mercury and other toxins in the MMR shots and somehow you ignore that in favor of bullshit measles?
It's beyond idiotic these days, where even those who question the shots forget why the shots are really damaging- the mother fking toxicity, not the made up lore that matches broken ass immune "science". Ignoring the elephant in the room, they keep on repeating the bullshit that got us in this mess of vaccination in the first place.
You're a breath of fresh air!
Yes I think its good, you have pointed out some controlled opposition agents, they can be frustrating as so many people follow them (with their classic non sequiturs, " viruses" and just plain lies).
The Dr Baileys are always solid with science and good ones to recommend.
KEEP THIS PLEASE.
I get the frustration, but may I suggest that your title be trashed & burned? "Misinformation" is for each of us to decide for ourselves, and what's misinformation to me is someone else's truth to die for. "Out of control" suggests that there should be control. Nope. Let's please not encourage any tyrant fantasies about controlling others' speech.
Obviously we have a huge problem in that people increasingly don't know how to, or have any interest in learning, how to reason. So they are fertile ground for any and every fantasy that comes down the pike that affirms their fears & beliefs. This is what the education systems are designed to produce. Without reasoning ability, it's emotions that decide truth. The unfortunate reality is that what will restore personal responsibility for reasoning is people being brutalized by charlatans. When they've had enough, they might decide to step up and become a bit harder to fool.
Naomi Wolf's recent piece on the mRNA in the jabs presents the same issue as your other examples. I wrote a rather lengthy reply pointing out that we don't actually know they contain any mRNA, and asking why anyone is believing anything the pharma companies or 'health authorities' are saying is in the jabs, especially considering all of the lies and cover-ups since 2020. Pretty much crickets was the response.
On a recent Igor Chudov post discussing a recent published paper that reported finding mRNA from the jabs in breast milk, I read the paper and then pointed out in the comments why the lab methods don't actually prove the conclusion. Again, crickets.
This same refusal to engage in real debate and learn is happening everywhere. And I don't blame just the writers, because we're proving that their audiences too don't really want to know the truth, they want to know what's comfortable given their current beliefs.
I don't know if you saw the interview of Bigtree by Derrick Broze, but it was interesting. Broze asked him why he doesn't address the virus isolation issue, and he suggested that he thinks people aren't ready to hear it. I think he was playing to who he thought the audience would be, and I'm not convinced that he understands the virus isolation issue. I think when you're very successful and have a huge following, like he and RFK, you stick with the proven formula, and don't give your attention to things that have an air of being disruptive. The virus isolation issue is major disruption.
Everyone wants stability, and is comfortable with what they perceive as the 'knowns', and it's actually a rare person who dives into the unknown looking for their 'knowns' to be shattered. Therefore, sharing truths that expose sacred lies and superstitions will always be a lonely business.