Alt media jab misinformation is out of control

On jab truth, alt media is flooded with nonsense about AI, 5G and gene editing and is not looking at what is in the vial, in the blood and in the corpses.

Note: I really am not happy with Substack not allowing me to delete posts, because I did want to delete this one as it is not a post I really wanted to post as such. I could do a much bigger bang-up on this, but I won’t unless things get a lot worse. Since I can’t delete it, I’ve left it here, but honestly, I do not like Substack’s free version as it gives you virtually no control over your blog. No schedule a post option.

---

I would like to suggest to everyone at this time to please listen with critical caution to certain people who are talking about what is in the jab.

It appears to me that few of these people are truly scientifically literate and they appear to have no idea how to read studies, if they do read them at all.

Ex-military Dr. Rashid Buttar pops up again after two years to explain hydrogels but also talk variants, and about how persecuted he was on YouTube.

Although I greatly admire Dr. Naomi Wolf’s digging into the Pfizer documents, she actually so far has no evidence of PEG in breast milk after COVID vaccination because NIH researchers didn’t actually look for it.

But, as of yet, she cannot tell you that because she did not fully explore the study.

I don’t know if there are other studies on this issue. I am just referring to the May 29 Substack, of which some hay has been made.

Here is the section of the NIH preprint cited by Naomi Wolf in May of this year, which was never peer-reviewed, showing how the researchers looked for PEG in the breast milk (and infant stools).

So, despite the researchers stating in their introduction that their method could find vaccine-related PEGylated proteins (proteins bound to PEG), they later note their method finds all PEGylated proteins and not just those from the vaccine.

They also diluted the breast milk eight times over (1:8 dilution), after it had been stored at -80 degrees Celsius (for what purpose and how long?).

Infant stools that were tested in this study were also diluted five times.

Researchers then used software (Prism 9) to “interpolate” the concentration of PEGylated proteins in the human milk samples compared to “standard reference curves” for the presumed PEG concentrations in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

The Prism 9 software is a data analytics/graphics application for scientists, so it is unclear how this could detect any true concentration. Interpolation is a process of determining unknown values that lie in between known data points. It is used to predict unknown values, not measure them, as per science.

It’s considered “predictive modeling”. What it’s not is science. Applied mathematical guessing is what it is.

The upshot here is that this study didn’t actually test the breast milk for PEG because they diluted it eight times and used computer modeling as well as indirect and flawed detection methods.

They also did not follow the subjects consistently or for very long for a safety study, which Wolf well pointed out.

So, in actuality there is no way these researchers could tell you anything about the breast milk. The study appears to be an exercise in NOT finding PEG in breast milk.

Hence, that the NIH preprint (which never got peer review) cited by Wolf in May did not find PEG in breast milk does not mean there is no evidence of PEG in the breast milk or jab. Wolf is right about that, but she didn’t identify the fraud here.

So I don’t think Wolf is trying to promote misinformation in any way, to be clear, and overall she’s doing great work exposing the Pfizer documents. Nonetheless, I hope this clarifies the issue.

Meanwhile, attorney for jab-resisting soldiers Todd Callender has been speaking about Marburg viruses being in the jab and genetic modification. He appears to be trying to scare people into thinking they will be patented, that they are “chattel property”, and that they will be another form of human being that can be patented, “homoborgenesis”.

It seems to me that patent analyst Karen Kingston is getting ahead of herself in terms the vaccine technology. She’s good at finding patents but I am not sure she is looking at the cumulative literature.

She is talking about AI technology in the jab and also asserting that GO hydrogels and RNA are in the jab together. So far, there is evidence for neither of these claims.

When I try to go to Karen’s links that are at the bottom of the documents she shows in her media appearances, I find that the links are dead such as: http://modernatx/sites/default/files/US10703789.pdf, as discussed with Mike Adams.

This link is dead. So was the other link for the other patent mentioned in Karen’s discussion with Stew Peters last week.

Kingston, who keeps calling La Quinta Columna “La Quinta Columbia”, does not seem well acquainted with their work despite its being around for nearly two years.

On a related note, reporter Eric Coppolino told Stew Peters that the in silico genetic sequences used to concoct virus genomes were created by AI. This is false.

There is no AI involved in the sequencers Megahit or the 454 FLX system or any other. This is advanced computing involving large, complex data sets; but the literature shows this is not AI.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny waxes on about spike proteins and toll-like receptors, but there is no evidence for the existence of toll-like receptors, or spike, and no evidence of spike proteins or their alleged sequences have been found in the jab (more on this to come). She is certainly not alone.

After her recent interview with Dr. Robert O. Young detailing evidence of no virus, Australian reporter Maria Zeee went back to talking viruses and RNA, or whatever. She also did the above-mentioned interview with Todd Callender.

Interestingly, however, Dr. Young promoted his video on Odysee using the title, ““Viruses Don’t Exist” Explained, Nanotech Inside People is a Bio-Weapon”.

Well, we still don’t have biological material per se, but Dr. Young, lying about his results as he is, keeps stating the jab is a bioweapon.

We have a chemical weapon that is also likely an EMF weapon.

So many alt media personalities continue to talk authoritatively about viruses, RNA and spike, or genetic manipulation, without evidence for any of these.

Are they leaders, or misleaders?

Children’s Health Defense has been dismissive of the truth that there is no SARS2 virus and ignores independent jab studies altogether; but I was very encouraged to see the Viral Delusion people speak with Mary Holland.

Maybe it was for show, but time will tell. I think the interview was excellent and a real victory for No Virus/Terrain Team.

I hope CHD can soon admit there is no evidence of a SARS-CoV-2 virus, as described.

I also hope they can come to terms with what has been found in the jab by independent researchers. I will do my best to fully support these efforts.

I offer these critiques to be helpful. If someone feels hurt by my candor, I apologize.