Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman are more and more suspect. They ignore the kill shot and diminish the seriousness of situation we are in. This is not "just" the jab killing people here and there, this is a genocide. They need to expose the graphene jab but they're obfuscating and consenting to the gene editing "theory". What can one conclude but that they are keeping anti-virus "movement" back by not engaging in the public vaxx "debate".
I did a little bit of reading up a few years ago on CRISPR experiments (assuming they did what the research papers claim), and my take-away was that it's anything but precise. All of the attempts produced unforeseen and unpredictable collateral damage to other (non-targeted) parts of the gene. That hadn't changed come 2020, and then all of a sudden we get Warp Speed that in a few months delivers precise, safe & effective gene editing. Sure.
We know the glaring questions: If they can make a gene-editing mRNA vax, why isn't there any mRNA in the vaxes? And considering that those at the top know the whole virus story is weak hypothesis at best, why would they spend billions developing a technology to 'protect' people from..., what, a fictional virus? None of it makes any sense. The whole thing is a massive con. It's always been about injecting long-lasting poisons to weaken the subjects, and the only thing that's changed is they've come up with a new generation of poisons.
That's depressing, reading about attorney Todd. Agree, those armed services members deserve the best representation, and instead they get dopey who missed the lessons in law school about only saying what you can prove. It seems like he's trying to look like a nut. Might be interesting to find out who's really paying him.
Regarding claims of gene-editing and patents, I'm reminded of the long-term genetics study of the Icelandic population, that's been going for maybe 30 years or so. It's well-established that people's genetic code changes slightly over time, some people more than others.
And I'd wager that if a person is poisoned with a novel brew that their body has never seen before, there will be a little genetic update when their body has learned how to clear the new toxins (assuming they survive and recover).
So does the pharma company have a legal claim to the genetic update that resulted from them fraudulently poisoning you? I hate to say it, but as corrupt as the US legal system has become, the answer is probably "yes". Even if you could find an honest attorney or prosecutor, no court would allow the evidence to be presented that could prove it's all a con.
Crispr never worked. They claim it does, but how do we know that the so called plant modifications done with it were not done just by breeding plants, which works and has been done for a long long time?
I forget when, but the stupid USA patent system allowed companies to patent life, if it was manually edited. That's why they have to claim the hybridization of plants etc was caused by a mythological tech called crispr.
All these doctors who came out of the woodwork at the start of 2020 are suspect. Madej, Kaufman and maybe even Cowan (although I can’t recall if he was a member as well) are all new agers associated with “The academy of Divine Knowledge”. The fact that they pal around with known shills is enough for me to write them off. This “no virus” bullcrap (whether it’s true or not) is right up the alley of intelligence agencies and is reminiscent of how the Illuminati hoax got started with the discordians (operation mindfuck) back in the damn 60s.
You may be interested in what David Martin has to say here about what those involved have stated publicly and in patent applications: https://rumble.com/v1acoaa-up-to-100-million-will-die-from-cv19-vax-by-2028-dr-david-martin.html?fbclid=IwAR2iolYy005Yi1qFTAz46UfNOMezuNudWl3BbIbRia22XbEZiacjGSo3XT0
Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman are more and more suspect. They ignore the kill shot and diminish the seriousness of situation we are in. This is not "just" the jab killing people here and there, this is a genocide. They need to expose the graphene jab but they're obfuscating and consenting to the gene editing "theory". What can one conclude but that they are keeping anti-virus "movement" back by not engaging in the public vaxx "debate".
Mullie's Law:
no jab mRNA = no virus = no spike protein => chemical poisoning
Marc Mullie MD
Montreal
I did a little bit of reading up a few years ago on CRISPR experiments (assuming they did what the research papers claim), and my take-away was that it's anything but precise. All of the attempts produced unforeseen and unpredictable collateral damage to other (non-targeted) parts of the gene. That hadn't changed come 2020, and then all of a sudden we get Warp Speed that in a few months delivers precise, safe & effective gene editing. Sure.
We know the glaring questions: If they can make a gene-editing mRNA vax, why isn't there any mRNA in the vaxes? And considering that those at the top know the whole virus story is weak hypothesis at best, why would they spend billions developing a technology to 'protect' people from..., what, a fictional virus? None of it makes any sense. The whole thing is a massive con. It's always been about injecting long-lasting poisons to weaken the subjects, and the only thing that's changed is they've come up with a new generation of poisons.
That's depressing, reading about attorney Todd. Agree, those armed services members deserve the best representation, and instead they get dopey who missed the lessons in law school about only saying what you can prove. It seems like he's trying to look like a nut. Might be interesting to find out who's really paying him.
Regarding claims of gene-editing and patents, I'm reminded of the long-term genetics study of the Icelandic population, that's been going for maybe 30 years or so. It's well-established that people's genetic code changes slightly over time, some people more than others.
And I'd wager that if a person is poisoned with a novel brew that their body has never seen before, there will be a little genetic update when their body has learned how to clear the new toxins (assuming they survive and recover).
So does the pharma company have a legal claim to the genetic update that resulted from them fraudulently poisoning you? I hate to say it, but as corrupt as the US legal system has become, the answer is probably "yes". Even if you could find an honest attorney or prosecutor, no court would allow the evidence to be presented that could prove it's all a con.
Crispr never worked. They claim it does, but how do we know that the so called plant modifications done with it were not done just by breeding plants, which works and has been done for a long long time?
I forget when, but the stupid USA patent system allowed companies to patent life, if it was manually edited. That's why they have to claim the hybridization of plants etc was caused by a mythological tech called crispr.
All these doctors who came out of the woodwork at the start of 2020 are suspect. Madej, Kaufman and maybe even Cowan (although I can’t recall if he was a member as well) are all new agers associated with “The academy of Divine Knowledge”. The fact that they pal around with known shills is enough for me to write them off. This “no virus” bullcrap (whether it’s true or not) is right up the alley of intelligence agencies and is reminiscent of how the Illuminati hoax got started with the discordians (operation mindfuck) back in the damn 60s.