Vials subjected to a variety of independent microscopic and spectroscopic observations and analyses have shown little nucleic acid material and lots of graphene oxide.
Dr. Daniel Nagase of Canada did elemental spectroscopy on Pfizer and Moderna and found no detectable nitrogen or phosphorous in those vaccines... an impossibility if they really contained mRNA encased in nanolipids.
Yeah I knew about it but no one will get me his email to get he slides. Christine Massey refuses to give me his email. She is a piece of work to be sure. Little does the public know how she communicates in reality.
This is very interesting, especially in the midst of the Wagh scandal.
First, why are they pretending that looking at salt crystallization in evaporating solution is something new? And second, the images he provides look exactly like I'd expect salt crystallization to look like, and nothing like the GO images that others have published. And why does the paper say nothing about anything else found in the vax samples he was supposedly using? Did he get a sample of covid vax that was pure saline solution?
I think it's quite possible that some of the geometric shapes in some of the amateur microscopic images, which are being called 'computer chips' by some, could reasonably be salt crystals forming. So the paper has some value regarding that. But to suggest that GO looks the same is grossly inaccurate, in my view. I have to question Wakeling's motives.
Couple of notes: the Baileys, whom I have concerns about due to their link with Coppolino, called Wakeling a microbiologist. He is not. He is a forest science expert who does work with microbes in trees.
I alerted Baileys and Cowan and Kaufman to this. Wakeling was also involved in a political scandal wherein he lied about his results. In short, I do not trust the work or integrity of the Baileys, or they are young and naive. Only time will tell. Let's look at the report.
McCairn also says he found no GO even though his data is nearly identical to others. I will follow up in future posts with what everyone said.
Yeah their line has been they're salt crystals. Well yes, lots of salt is in there, but what has been found are microfilaments, sheets and tubes. These are conformations not seen in salt crystals.
Excelente recopilación.. el investigador de biología molecular de Argentina se llama Juan Garberi.. el científico de España se llama Pablo Campra.. se ha encontrado GRAFENO en los viales en más de 20 países.. por espectroscopia microraman en Reino Unido.. el dr. Young tiene una posición rara.. Judy mikovits está muy comprometida con el gobierno de EEUU.. en estos días dos científicas de Argentina publicarán investigación con microscopio de fluorescencia y electrónico dónde se confirma la presencia de grafeno y la ausencia de ARN
I thought this document on graphene oxide is interesting and will have to fully read it, but it's a summary of health effects on it. It says there has been little study on it (at least not in mainstream science):
Glad to see more writing on this topic. I've been following it closely too since the first report from La Quinta more than a year ago. That first analysis was admittedly inconclusive, but what it suggested should've touched off a major movement by other groups to do a more thorough independent analysis. It's been stunning to instead see just silence.
I'd also been following Young for decades, and so knew he would look into it, as it's right in his specialty of looking at live blood. I too have no idea why he reported finding virtually no RNA and yet then talks about RNA in the vax, and agree that his long-time statements about the cause of cancer and other diseases is every bit as unproven as what Rockefeller medicine claims. There seems to be a pattern of doctors who wake up to the horrors and lies of Rockefeller medicine and all end up thinking that terrain theory must then be the explanation for all disease. I guess because they can't find any other Western theory, and they don't know enough about how the body works to figure it out on their own, so terrain theory is the default last choice. Definitely not a scientific approach.
I'd like to learn more about the technology behind the claimed mRNA vaccines, partly because I too have not seen a shred of evidence that there's any such thing in the 'covid' clot shots. I didn't believe the whole narrative about the sudden development and mass production of the mRNA shots, partly because I don't believe such a thing could be produced at that scale and still work reliably, and partly because I've known for a long time that the medical/pharmaceutical industry is built upon lies & deception and vaccines have always been primarily a poison concoction. I'm convinced that the toxins have always been the primary active ingredient, and the rest is a con.
I've also been following the work of Stefan Lanka for decades, so I know the extent to which the medical/pharma industry lies and fakes research. Lanka doesn't believe the mRNA story either.
Regarding Wagh, I didn't watch any of the interviews, but based upon what I've read it sounds like she has lied about her credentials. I'm not aware of any research she's released to back up her claims, so the lies is a pretty good reason to dismiss her. Her testing 2000 vials of vax is simply not believable. And if she was really involved in such a major study, why is it a secret. Who were the other members of the "group", and why have they not published their work, especially since she's being called a liar by lots of people? Sorry, but I don't believe her. But I'm not going to write an article calling her a liar, because I just don't know for sure, yet.
I'm interested in an article from you that goes into more detail about the difference between mRNA and modRNA. What is the modRNA, how is it produced, and how does it get into cells and how does it affect the RNA or DNA of a living human cell?
Interesting that you mention Webb's article on about Resilience. I commented on her Telegram channel that I think the reason the CIA is taking over control of producing ingredients for the 'vaccines' is that they're lying about what the ingredients are and therefore must keep the ingredients secret. And I mentioned the graphene oxide. No reply. This topic seems to scare even most of the truthers. The big takeaway from her article, though, is that the pharma industry really has totally merged with the deep state and military.
Yes, I saw you on Coppolino's comments. You had excellent commentary.
I was very very disappointed in Cowan and Kaufman and I've been pushing them a lot of this content through email. But they never paid it any serious attention, which was a red flag to me.
The answer is that our world medical systems are the best medical systems we have: started with Ayurveda, then to Traditional Chinese Medicine and then Greek medicine which morphed into Western herbalism. So, we have a great and successful tradition if only we honor the integrity of nature. Pharma cannot ever formulate like Nature can.
ModRNA cannot get into anyone's cells, and again we have no evidence of it being in any jab. I will try and go over all of these things. However, Wagh has not been proven to be a liar by any means as there are alternate explanations and I think we need to hear her out. Attacks by political hacks like Coppolino should not be tolerated. Coppolino works for known CIA controlled op outlet Pacifica Radio. Coppolino is a disgrace and should be excluded from any health freedom movement as he will only disrupt it.
The no virus group disgraces themselves by continuing to associate with Coppolino. They have been warned he is not a legit actor. Read my follow-up post.
WW is CIA and I use her but she works for them. Most alt media is 100% controlled. I am not.
THERE IS NO WAY THEY CAN GENE EDIT BUT THEY NEED YOU TO BELIEVE THEY CAN FOR THE PATENT PURPOSES.
Thanks for your comments. I admire your interest and your advanced state of knowledge.
I hadn't read Coppolino until just last week, but just took notice that he's a newbie to the no-virus community. Funny reading your take, because I had friction with him in the comments immediately. He was blasting someone for bringing up the holocaust, and issued an ultimatum to boot anyone questioning the history. I pointed out the hypocrisy, especially in light of him supposedly realizing that huge narratives that we've believed for a century can be all lies. Well, he obviously didn't appreciate that much truth, and won't like or comment on any of my posts. So I'm not impressed with him.
Regarding Kaufman, I tried to get in touch with him a couple times back in 2020 when his videos first showed up. I'd been following Lanka for almost 20 years at that point, so suddenly seeing a US doctor making videos about virology fraud was a big deal, and I was thrilled to get in touch. I mentioned all of that in emails, and told him I 'd share Lanka's contact info with him, and he never responded. Weird. I suspect that maybe he just wants to appear to be the first to figure out the virology fraud. The human personality can be a strange thing.
I'm curious why you say that about Webb. She's definitely a star in alt journalism, and with her new book coming soon will become much more well-known. I have super instincts for that sort of thing (partly from personal experience with spooks during a stint working for the UN in Bosnia), and I don't pick that up from her. Wouldn't be the first time though that the CIA gets one of their own to write the big stories about deep-state characters like Epstein & Maxwell.
I disagree somewhat when you say there's no physical shedding. I know the magnetism is real (from extended family members who are acting like idiots and got vaxed), and it's totally explained by the graphene oxide in the blood, and with the body full of highly-conductive particles then simple electro-physics dictates that the particles will resonate with magnetic fields including RF radiation. So to me it's not a question of either radiation or particle shedding; I think it's both. I've studied health & healing as my primary passion since my teens, and it's a simple fact that the skin is one of the primary ways the body eliminates toxins. Published research has already established that the material is absorbed through the skin. So if the graphene oxide is in the vax, then some of it is being shed through the skin over time. The only question would be what state of decomposition the particles are in when they're expelled.
All of my instincts agree that gene editing is another fraud. I've heard Lanka mention that sentiment as well, and there's nobody on the planet who I respect more than him. I think they're faking the capability for profit & control, same as the virology con. It's a massive fleecing of Wall St., and nobody suspects a thing. And it has the population looking at the 'scientists' as god-like figures, literally handing them the keys to the kingdom. At this point, all I can do is laugh.
We have some interests in common. If you have access to my email address, feel free to email. I've been pondering Rappoport's encouragements for people to write, so thinking about starting my own substack too.
I told Rapp about graphene on day 1. He has been resistance. In my opinion, he's done and rightfully encouraging the next generation. He did great work and we are indebted to him, but he missed this story.
Nobody pops on the scene like that like she did, with voluminous research. Yeah she's smart but I looked into her background and she's from Sarasota and her family is upper echelon, and there was another tip from an insider. She traveled wherever she wanted during COVID and in fact moved from Chile to the UK. How does that happen for an average person during COVID?
Basically watching her narratives and coverage, you begin to suss them out. For sure, she is not legit. She rejected this data with no review. That's not legit.
Also Mint Press is Iranian oligarch backed, in league with Zionists. She is from there, but yeah, I know she left, to give herself more legitimacy, for sure. That outfit is 100% controlled.
You watch things for 25 years, you live in the heart of power, you study power, and you learn.
I didn't know she moved to the UK. That would be very odd, but I'm keeping an open mind. I note these things and watch.
Part of the reason a few infiltrators can completely disrupt a 'truth' movement like this is because when people realize the movement has attracted that attention, people become paranoid and begin accusing anyone who says anything unpopular within the group. The group ends up attacking itself. So I'm hesitant to label someone as controlled unless there's real evidence. Many people just automatically advocate for established views because that's where they're comfortable. There's really not many people who thrive being way out on the tiny limbs. like me.
BTW, I added my last name to my profile, but it appears that the old posts don't update.
This is a hell of a discussion, very much enjoyed reading it and will subscribe to your substack. Regarding WW, I have an article by a journalist named Daniel Hopsicker that details her background a bit and the shady CIA-linked funding of MintPress News. Seems like you’re already aware of that, but maybe you haven’t read the article. It’s called “Paint it Mint”. Hopsicker had written a second part called “Paint it Mint Again” but had to remove it from the web because they share the same publisher Trine Day. Daniel wouldn’t even send me a personal copy despite promising to keep it to myself, so there’s definitely more about her than meets the eye.
Her association with Catherine Austin Fitts and the new age “disinformation dozen” could help us shine a light on which team she’s playing for. According to ISGP-studies.com (written and curated by the indefatigable Joel van der Reijden) Catherine Austin Fitts was a regular guest (and might still be for all I know) on Coast2Coast AM, a well-known spook disinformation show. I haven’t examined her work closely on the “missing trillions” theory of money being shuttled off books to fund a “secret space program” but on it’s face it seems far-fetched. Maybe there’s something to it, maybe parts of it are true, I won’t comment further until after I’ve reviewed it. Regardless, these people are in a network of sorts.
I liked Webb’s work, but her trashing of La Quinta Columna raised alarm bells for me last year and that’s when I decided to check her background. Her new book looks very interesting, but one thing people seem to miss with the Epstein story is why would Epstein blackmail Prince Andrew when Ghislaine and her father had ties to the royal family going back decades before Epstein was busted for his blackmail operation? Wouldn’t it make more sense that they were working on behalf of and with the protection of the highest levels of the UK state? I wonder whether she examined that in the book or if she’s gonna just pretend he’s a spy solely for Israel?
Just a layman here with questions. Do you know if all the researchers tested vials that were kept at the recommended very low temperature until the contents were tested? I ask because it seems that the temperature has an effect on the viability of mRNA. Also, we have all seen many reports on social media from people who claim to have been victims of a shedding syndrome, most notably the effects on women's periods. This has been attributed to the spike protein spreading from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated and of course not graphene. Effects on the immune system are also not mentioned - another feature supposedly of the mRNA content. I am probably not being fair as your article just addresses what the researches found and is very thorough in that regard. Nonetheless, it left me with those questions (and more but I will stop here).
We do not know if the vials were kept at the temperature, however, I would state that since C and O are found in high quantities and N and P in little to no quantities, there's still nothing there whatever the temperature is. You're still presuming RNA is there and you can't presume to know.
Shedding in actuality is transmission. GO is conductive. There is no such thing as shedding.
The temperature wouldn't matter. The spectroscopic analysis that's been done identifies specific elements, not complex molecules, so even if the supposed mRNA material were to break down before testing, the same elements are still there. Specific elements that would have to be in mRNA are not showing up at all, or in miniscule trace amounts.
The shedding is real. Even Pfizer's own documents discuss the shedding, and advised doctors in the so-called 'trials' to look for effects in family member who will be in contact with the vaxed person. And I think what's being shed is graphene oxide, although I haven't seen anyone even try to set up a research attempt to identify the material being shed. But the skin and lungs are major absorption & elimination organs, and are always shedding toxins from the body. If there's really graphene oxide in the vaxxes, as the early research shows, and we know from lots of research that graphene oxide travels throughout the body and into the blood stream & all organs, there's no doubt the body will be shedding some of it through the skin. I know people who've had a severe skin reaction just from physical contact with someone who was recently vaxed. And graphene oxide explains why.
The "spike protein" is part of the virology con. How can there be a virus spike protein when no one has ever proven the existence of any virus? In reality, what they're calling a 'virus' is simply fragments of DNA released by dying cells that have been poisoned. So obviously the 'spike protein' too is part of that material released by the dying cells. To get cells to "produce a spike protein", all one has to do is poison them in a certain way. The labs have become quite adept at finding the precise way to poison cells in order to get the results they're looking for.
If these findings are true we need to revise many things about our model from one of bioweapon depopulation to one of outright chemical poisoning. The major smoking gun of course is the lack of any mRNA in the vials. Others have commented on this:
The findings by Wagh are not published for obvious reasons, and neither are the names of the other scientists. Remember, these vials were obtained through 'inside' channels. My opinion on Wagh is she is legit, it would not be that easy to publish this OR publish the names of the scientists, and they are all likely very afraid of being "Noack'ed". She sounds very credible and has much experience as a lab tech, but we are going on pure faith here. A big Kierkegaardian leap.
We cannot tell on the basis of clinical findings if this is true or not, because all of the patient signs and symptoms could just as well be from toxins than any SPs, including the strange fibrotic clots.
If I was eugenicist in all this, I might devise a plan as follows. Fake a virus and invent the need for a so-called vaccine supposedly made of mRNA in LNPs to stimulate Ab production, when in fact it is a chemical poison. You would then have an excuse to jab every arm, which is what they obviously have been trying to do across the world.
In fact to get people off your trail, you could even invent patents for fake SPs, fake lab leaks of fake viruses, fake boosters for added 'protection', and let a bunch of substackers bloviate about the viral theory and write articles about all this when in fact you are chemically poisoning and killing humanity with chemicals like hydrogels, graphene, LNPs and heavy metals.
Sounds like a double agenda: death by jabs by chemical poisoning, and those who survive will be graphene -5G AI slaves.
Keep up the great work, you are in the right rabbit hole.
Just adding another little puzzle piece that I haven't seen anyone else mention anywhere.
Reading the ACS "Safety Assessment of Graphene" paper that i linked in a previous comment, I noticed that researchers have been combining GO with PEG for bio-compatibility studies, calling the PEG a "functionalizing" agent. Reportedly the PEG helps the GO particles pass through cell walls, which they consider an improvement in bio-compatibility.
And of course PEG is one of the listed ingredients in the covid vaxes. Is that a coincidence, or is the PEG in there because they're using rGO functionalized with PEG?
All the researchers checking for SARAS-COV-2 should be given the Nobel Prize if it still exists for - discovering NOTHING.....The greatest medical discovery in Mankind's history was NOTHING.
Would be interesting to see how many people were awarded Nobel Prizes for fraudulent research in virology over the past century. Probably many. Louis Pasteur was a total fraud too, and all of the research supposedly showing bacteria as the cause of disease is likewise fraud. Nikola Tesla thought Einstein was a fraud, and I'd put every dollar in my name on Tesla to win that debate. The inescapable conclusion is that people elevate liars into leadership, and shun truth. The entire Western political scene confirms this. Getting rid of the current leadership changes nothing. Until masses of people take responsibility for their part in creating this mess, there's no solution.
Exactly. It only works that way because when the liars elevate another liar and put him/her on stage, people cheer. If people threw rotten tomatoes instead, and then chased the liars out of town with a warning to never come back, there would be profound changes very quickly. But sadly, people just won't accept responsibility for who they put in charge, instead pretending they're just victims.
Reminds me of the amazing story of Cheran, Mexico, where the whole population of good people finally had enough of being victims, and armed themselves and chased out the corrupt government and police and the drug cartels, and have been completely self-governed since. It's inspiring. People really can take their lives back from the thieves if they could muster the courage.
There's something else in the ACS paper that I took note of when I read it quickly a couple weeks ago, and I just went back and reviewed it.
You've probably seen the reports recently of all the embalmers and pathologists pulling huge growths, what they're calling "clots" but look like soft tissue, out of the veins & arteries of dead people?
In the ACS article, check out the section "Biodistribution and Fate of Graphene-Based Materials". Multiple researchers have reported the accumulation of fibroblasts and fibrous collagen growths in GO-contaminated tissues. They report "signs of tissue injury and remodeling, evidenced by collagen deposition (fibrosis)".
This is a glaring suggestion of what those growths are.
Yes I saw this however I believe it was detailing degradable hydrogels. I thought of that as well. It will likely be updated but there was some reason it was not included.
I have a question. Poornima Wagh equated adjuvants with preservatives. My understanding is that according to vaccine developers, adjuvants are placed in certain vaccines in order to provoke the immune system to produce antibodies, but that preservatives are entirely different and that they are included in the vials to prevent microbial growth. Can you clear this up for me? Thanks!
I think she generically linked them. Adjuvants are toxins to elicit the "immune response". Preservatives are also toxins. This is why she linked them. There is no real difference. The preservatives were just shown to kill microbes. Toxins will kill microbes. What is the difference? Likely degree of toxicity. Adjuvants would be more toxic.
A Spanish alternative therapist (who I have connected) looked at people affected by Covid 19 vaccines coming to his office with fluorescent lamp and light off the room. He looked at the skin of the patients. He saw blue, red, yellow and white dots on the chest, back, neck, that is, in the areas where there was magnetism. These dots are expelled to the outside. El color varía en función del tamaño de los puntos (puntos cuánticos de grafeno)
Hi. I've read the first third of this article, very well written. I would however challenge the nature of the "clots" being found. You said: "And, the actual scientific evidence also shows that the graphene shots can explain the severe clotting damage seen by embalmers of vaccinated persons better than current popular theories." Mike Adams has a lab that forensically analyzed some of these rubbery "clots" and these obstructions are not made from human tissue components, but from aluminum and other junk that was also found in the injection fluid by prior researchers. https://thereisnopandemic.net/2022/08/23/shocking-white-embalmer-clots-are-self-assembling-circuits-dr-jane-ruby-and-mike-adams/
Also, I've watched a lot of La Quinta Columna and others on the topic of graphene oxide. I don't see how we can infer that they have not found evidence of "mRNA" in the injection fluid from the fact they found lots of graphene oxide. I haven't seen La Quinta or anyone else until Dr. Wagh, flat-out state that there's no mRNA in the shots. If there is none, that would be really good news. But the genetic damage caused by the graphene oxide is a horror story on its own.
No I stay off controlled ops outside of this since I am new to Substack. I will likely do something called UTOPIA. It's encrypted private messaging. I am not yet on Telegram. Dorsey owned I think.
Dr. Daniel Nagase of Canada did elemental spectroscopy on Pfizer and Moderna and found no detectable nitrogen or phosphorous in those vaccines... an impossibility if they really contained mRNA encased in nanolipids.
This is good stuff. Great news. I will try and get that paper if he has it. Do you have a link? If not no worries. THANKS!
If you didnt find it yet:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/btcrYK1oYcJn/
Yeah I knew about it but no one will get me his email to get he slides. Christine Massey refuses to give me his email. She is a piece of work to be sure. Little does the public know how she communicates in reality.
Have you seen Robin Wakeling's new paper, just published yesterday?
https://drsambailey.com/covid-vaccines-a-curious-discovery-on-the-graphene-oxide-question/
This is very interesting, especially in the midst of the Wagh scandal.
First, why are they pretending that looking at salt crystallization in evaporating solution is something new? And second, the images he provides look exactly like I'd expect salt crystallization to look like, and nothing like the GO images that others have published. And why does the paper say nothing about anything else found in the vax samples he was supposedly using? Did he get a sample of covid vax that was pure saline solution?
I think it's quite possible that some of the geometric shapes in some of the amateur microscopic images, which are being called 'computer chips' by some, could reasonably be salt crystals forming. So the paper has some value regarding that. But to suggest that GO looks the same is grossly inaccurate, in my view. I have to question Wakeling's motives.
Thanks for this. I will check it out.
Couple of notes: the Baileys, whom I have concerns about due to their link with Coppolino, called Wakeling a microbiologist. He is not. He is a forest science expert who does work with microbes in trees.
I alerted Baileys and Cowan and Kaufman to this. Wakeling was also involved in a political scandal wherein he lied about his results. In short, I do not trust the work or integrity of the Baileys, or they are young and naive. Only time will tell. Let's look at the report.
McCairn also says he found no GO even though his data is nearly identical to others. I will follow up in future posts with what everyone said.
Yeah their line has been they're salt crystals. Well yes, lots of salt is in there, but what has been found are microfilaments, sheets and tubes. These are conformations not seen in salt crystals.
BUNKY Paper. Nonsense.
Excelente recopilación.. el investigador de biología molecular de Argentina se llama Juan Garberi.. el científico de España se llama Pablo Campra.. se ha encontrado GRAFENO en los viales en más de 20 países.. por espectroscopia microraman en Reino Unido.. el dr. Young tiene una posición rara.. Judy mikovits está muy comprometida con el gobierno de EEUU.. en estos días dos científicas de Argentina publicarán investigación con microscopio de fluorescencia y electrónico dónde se confirma la presencia de grafeno y la ausencia de ARN
I thought this document on graphene oxide is interesting and will have to fully read it, but it's a summary of health effects on it. It says there has been little study on it (at least not in mainstream science):
https://cdn1.richplanet.net/pdf/0285.pdf
That document is from 2013, which is when the toxicity research was just ramping up, so it doesn't reflect the current state of knowledge.
This paper is 5 years newer, and there was already a huge amount of research being done:
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.8b04758
Thanks David. Appreciate that. I will check it out.
THANKS!
Glad to see more writing on this topic. I've been following it closely too since the first report from La Quinta more than a year ago. That first analysis was admittedly inconclusive, but what it suggested should've touched off a major movement by other groups to do a more thorough independent analysis. It's been stunning to instead see just silence.
I'd also been following Young for decades, and so knew he would look into it, as it's right in his specialty of looking at live blood. I too have no idea why he reported finding virtually no RNA and yet then talks about RNA in the vax, and agree that his long-time statements about the cause of cancer and other diseases is every bit as unproven as what Rockefeller medicine claims. There seems to be a pattern of doctors who wake up to the horrors and lies of Rockefeller medicine and all end up thinking that terrain theory must then be the explanation for all disease. I guess because they can't find any other Western theory, and they don't know enough about how the body works to figure it out on their own, so terrain theory is the default last choice. Definitely not a scientific approach.
I'd like to learn more about the technology behind the claimed mRNA vaccines, partly because I too have not seen a shred of evidence that there's any such thing in the 'covid' clot shots. I didn't believe the whole narrative about the sudden development and mass production of the mRNA shots, partly because I don't believe such a thing could be produced at that scale and still work reliably, and partly because I've known for a long time that the medical/pharmaceutical industry is built upon lies & deception and vaccines have always been primarily a poison concoction. I'm convinced that the toxins have always been the primary active ingredient, and the rest is a con.
I've also been following the work of Stefan Lanka for decades, so I know the extent to which the medical/pharma industry lies and fakes research. Lanka doesn't believe the mRNA story either.
Regarding Wagh, I didn't watch any of the interviews, but based upon what I've read it sounds like she has lied about her credentials. I'm not aware of any research she's released to back up her claims, so the lies is a pretty good reason to dismiss her. Her testing 2000 vials of vax is simply not believable. And if she was really involved in such a major study, why is it a secret. Who were the other members of the "group", and why have they not published their work, especially since she's being called a liar by lots of people? Sorry, but I don't believe her. But I'm not going to write an article calling her a liar, because I just don't know for sure, yet.
I'm interested in an article from you that goes into more detail about the difference between mRNA and modRNA. What is the modRNA, how is it produced, and how does it get into cells and how does it affect the RNA or DNA of a living human cell?
Interesting that you mention Webb's article on about Resilience. I commented on her Telegram channel that I think the reason the CIA is taking over control of producing ingredients for the 'vaccines' is that they're lying about what the ingredients are and therefore must keep the ingredients secret. And I mentioned the graphene oxide. No reply. This topic seems to scare even most of the truthers. The big takeaway from her article, though, is that the pharma industry really has totally merged with the deep state and military.
Look forward to more.
Yes, I saw you on Coppolino's comments. You had excellent commentary.
I was very very disappointed in Cowan and Kaufman and I've been pushing them a lot of this content through email. But they never paid it any serious attention, which was a red flag to me.
The answer is that our world medical systems are the best medical systems we have: started with Ayurveda, then to Traditional Chinese Medicine and then Greek medicine which morphed into Western herbalism. So, we have a great and successful tradition if only we honor the integrity of nature. Pharma cannot ever formulate like Nature can.
ModRNA cannot get into anyone's cells, and again we have no evidence of it being in any jab. I will try and go over all of these things. However, Wagh has not been proven to be a liar by any means as there are alternate explanations and I think we need to hear her out. Attacks by political hacks like Coppolino should not be tolerated. Coppolino works for known CIA controlled op outlet Pacifica Radio. Coppolino is a disgrace and should be excluded from any health freedom movement as he will only disrupt it.
The no virus group disgraces themselves by continuing to associate with Coppolino. They have been warned he is not a legit actor. Read my follow-up post.
WW is CIA and I use her but she works for them. Most alt media is 100% controlled. I am not.
THERE IS NO WAY THEY CAN GENE EDIT BUT THEY NEED YOU TO BELIEVE THEY CAN FOR THE PATENT PURPOSES.
Thanks for your comments. I admire your interest and your advanced state of knowledge.
I hadn't read Coppolino until just last week, but just took notice that he's a newbie to the no-virus community. Funny reading your take, because I had friction with him in the comments immediately. He was blasting someone for bringing up the holocaust, and issued an ultimatum to boot anyone questioning the history. I pointed out the hypocrisy, especially in light of him supposedly realizing that huge narratives that we've believed for a century can be all lies. Well, he obviously didn't appreciate that much truth, and won't like or comment on any of my posts. So I'm not impressed with him.
Regarding Kaufman, I tried to get in touch with him a couple times back in 2020 when his videos first showed up. I'd been following Lanka for almost 20 years at that point, so suddenly seeing a US doctor making videos about virology fraud was a big deal, and I was thrilled to get in touch. I mentioned all of that in emails, and told him I 'd share Lanka's contact info with him, and he never responded. Weird. I suspect that maybe he just wants to appear to be the first to figure out the virology fraud. The human personality can be a strange thing.
I'm curious why you say that about Webb. She's definitely a star in alt journalism, and with her new book coming soon will become much more well-known. I have super instincts for that sort of thing (partly from personal experience with spooks during a stint working for the UN in Bosnia), and I don't pick that up from her. Wouldn't be the first time though that the CIA gets one of their own to write the big stories about deep-state characters like Epstein & Maxwell.
I disagree somewhat when you say there's no physical shedding. I know the magnetism is real (from extended family members who are acting like idiots and got vaxed), and it's totally explained by the graphene oxide in the blood, and with the body full of highly-conductive particles then simple electro-physics dictates that the particles will resonate with magnetic fields including RF radiation. So to me it's not a question of either radiation or particle shedding; I think it's both. I've studied health & healing as my primary passion since my teens, and it's a simple fact that the skin is one of the primary ways the body eliminates toxins. Published research has already established that the material is absorbed through the skin. So if the graphene oxide is in the vax, then some of it is being shed through the skin over time. The only question would be what state of decomposition the particles are in when they're expelled.
All of my instincts agree that gene editing is another fraud. I've heard Lanka mention that sentiment as well, and there's nobody on the planet who I respect more than him. I think they're faking the capability for profit & control, same as the virology con. It's a massive fleecing of Wall St., and nobody suspects a thing. And it has the population looking at the 'scientists' as god-like figures, literally handing them the keys to the kingdom. At this point, all I can do is laugh.
We have some interests in common. If you have access to my email address, feel free to email. I've been pondering Rappoport's encouragements for people to write, so thinking about starting my own substack too.
I told Rapp about graphene on day 1. He has been resistance. In my opinion, he's done and rightfully encouraging the next generation. He did great work and we are indebted to him, but he missed this story.
Nobody pops on the scene like that like she did, with voluminous research. Yeah she's smart but I looked into her background and she's from Sarasota and her family is upper echelon, and there was another tip from an insider. She traveled wherever she wanted during COVID and in fact moved from Chile to the UK. How does that happen for an average person during COVID?
Basically watching her narratives and coverage, you begin to suss them out. For sure, she is not legit. She rejected this data with no review. That's not legit.
Also Mint Press is Iranian oligarch backed, in league with Zionists. She is from there, but yeah, I know she left, to give herself more legitimacy, for sure. That outfit is 100% controlled.
You watch things for 25 years, you live in the heart of power, you study power, and you learn.
I didn't know she moved to the UK. That would be very odd, but I'm keeping an open mind. I note these things and watch.
Part of the reason a few infiltrators can completely disrupt a 'truth' movement like this is because when people realize the movement has attracted that attention, people become paranoid and begin accusing anyone who says anything unpopular within the group. The group ends up attacking itself. So I'm hesitant to label someone as controlled unless there's real evidence. Many people just automatically advocate for established views because that's where they're comfortable. There's really not many people who thrive being way out on the tiny limbs. like me.
BTW, I added my last name to my profile, but it appears that the old posts don't update.
"Also Mint Press is Iranian oligarch backed, in league with Zionists." Evidence please.
This is a hell of a discussion, very much enjoyed reading it and will subscribe to your substack. Regarding WW, I have an article by a journalist named Daniel Hopsicker that details her background a bit and the shady CIA-linked funding of MintPress News. Seems like you’re already aware of that, but maybe you haven’t read the article. It’s called “Paint it Mint”. Hopsicker had written a second part called “Paint it Mint Again” but had to remove it from the web because they share the same publisher Trine Day. Daniel wouldn’t even send me a personal copy despite promising to keep it to myself, so there’s definitely more about her than meets the eye.
Her association with Catherine Austin Fitts and the new age “disinformation dozen” could help us shine a light on which team she’s playing for. According to ISGP-studies.com (written and curated by the indefatigable Joel van der Reijden) Catherine Austin Fitts was a regular guest (and might still be for all I know) on Coast2Coast AM, a well-known spook disinformation show. I haven’t examined her work closely on the “missing trillions” theory of money being shuttled off books to fund a “secret space program” but on it’s face it seems far-fetched. Maybe there’s something to it, maybe parts of it are true, I won’t comment further until after I’ve reviewed it. Regardless, these people are in a network of sorts.
I liked Webb’s work, but her trashing of La Quinta Columna raised alarm bells for me last year and that’s when I decided to check her background. Her new book looks very interesting, but one thing people seem to miss with the Epstein story is why would Epstein blackmail Prince Andrew when Ghislaine and her father had ties to the royal family going back decades before Epstein was busted for his blackmail operation? Wouldn’t it make more sense that they were working on behalf of and with the protection of the highest levels of the UK state? I wonder whether she examined that in the book or if she’s gonna just pretend he’s a spy solely for Israel?
Just a layman here with questions. Do you know if all the researchers tested vials that were kept at the recommended very low temperature until the contents were tested? I ask because it seems that the temperature has an effect on the viability of mRNA. Also, we have all seen many reports on social media from people who claim to have been victims of a shedding syndrome, most notably the effects on women's periods. This has been attributed to the spike protein spreading from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated and of course not graphene. Effects on the immune system are also not mentioned - another feature supposedly of the mRNA content. I am probably not being fair as your article just addresses what the researches found and is very thorough in that regard. Nonetheless, it left me with those questions (and more but I will stop here).
We do not know if the vials were kept at the temperature, however, I would state that since C and O are found in high quantities and N and P in little to no quantities, there's still nothing there whatever the temperature is. You're still presuming RNA is there and you can't presume to know.
Shedding in actuality is transmission. GO is conductive. There is no such thing as shedding.
The temperature wouldn't matter. The spectroscopic analysis that's been done identifies specific elements, not complex molecules, so even if the supposed mRNA material were to break down before testing, the same elements are still there. Specific elements that would have to be in mRNA are not showing up at all, or in miniscule trace amounts.
The shedding is real. Even Pfizer's own documents discuss the shedding, and advised doctors in the so-called 'trials' to look for effects in family member who will be in contact with the vaxed person. And I think what's being shed is graphene oxide, although I haven't seen anyone even try to set up a research attempt to identify the material being shed. But the skin and lungs are major absorption & elimination organs, and are always shedding toxins from the body. If there's really graphene oxide in the vaxxes, as the early research shows, and we know from lots of research that graphene oxide travels throughout the body and into the blood stream & all organs, there's no doubt the body will be shedding some of it through the skin. I know people who've had a severe skin reaction just from physical contact with someone who was recently vaxed. And graphene oxide explains why.
The "spike protein" is part of the virology con. How can there be a virus spike protein when no one has ever proven the existence of any virus? In reality, what they're calling a 'virus' is simply fragments of DNA released by dying cells that have been poisoned. So obviously the 'spike protein' too is part of that material released by the dying cells. To get cells to "produce a spike protein", all one has to do is poison them in a certain way. The labs have become quite adept at finding the precise way to poison cells in order to get the results they're looking for.
I just reviewed the findings in Wagh's group examination of 2305 vials:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BJqGWMB5uHzI/
here is my SUMMARY:
If these findings are true we need to revise many things about our model from one of bioweapon depopulation to one of outright chemical poisoning. The major smoking gun of course is the lack of any mRNA in the vials. Others have commented on this:
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/want-to-know-whats-inside-the-vaccine
Others found badly damaged mRNA, which would not penetrate cells, and not have any effect, (but could be a subterfuge for toxins also).
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/documents-leaked-from-the-ema-confirms
The findings by Wagh are not published for obvious reasons, and neither are the names of the other scientists. Remember, these vials were obtained through 'inside' channels. My opinion on Wagh is she is legit, it would not be that easy to publish this OR publish the names of the scientists, and they are all likely very afraid of being "Noack'ed". She sounds very credible and has much experience as a lab tech, but we are going on pure faith here. A big Kierkegaardian leap.
We cannot tell on the basis of clinical findings if this is true or not, because all of the patient signs and symptoms could just as well be from toxins than any SPs, including the strange fibrotic clots.
If I was eugenicist in all this, I might devise a plan as follows. Fake a virus and invent the need for a so-called vaccine supposedly made of mRNA in LNPs to stimulate Ab production, when in fact it is a chemical poison. You would then have an excuse to jab every arm, which is what they obviously have been trying to do across the world.
In fact to get people off your trail, you could even invent patents for fake SPs, fake lab leaks of fake viruses, fake boosters for added 'protection', and let a bunch of substackers bloviate about the viral theory and write articles about all this when in fact you are chemically poisoning and killing humanity with chemicals like hydrogels, graphene, LNPs and heavy metals.
Sounds like a double agenda: death by jabs by chemical poisoning, and those who survive will be graphene -5G AI slaves.
Keep up the great work, you are in the right rabbit hole.
Marc Mullie MD
Montreal
Just adding another little puzzle piece that I haven't seen anyone else mention anywhere.
Reading the ACS "Safety Assessment of Graphene" paper that i linked in a previous comment, I noticed that researchers have been combining GO with PEG for bio-compatibility studies, calling the PEG a "functionalizing" agent. Reportedly the PEG helps the GO particles pass through cell walls, which they consider an improvement in bio-compatibility.
And of course PEG is one of the listed ingredients in the covid vaxes. Is that a coincidence, or is the PEG in there because they're using rGO functionalized with PEG?
Can GO and PEG enter body tissues through ingesting food, because if so, why bother with injections.
If you want to kill, this does it.
It's insane to watch all the biotech companies say these are successful, safe and effective "vaccines."
Most things are not absorbed very well through ingestion. This is why so many drugs are more effective intravenously.
That's the good news.
But if this graphene can take a razor blade sharpness, maybe it can penetrate the gut linings.
All the researchers checking for SARAS-COV-2 should be given the Nobel Prize if it still exists for - discovering NOTHING.....The greatest medical discovery in Mankind's history was NOTHING.
Yup, the greatest feat is fooling the people and paying off those who should know better.
And the fools remained as fools to this day.
Would be interesting to see how many people were awarded Nobel Prizes for fraudulent research in virology over the past century. Probably many. Louis Pasteur was a total fraud too, and all of the research supposedly showing bacteria as the cause of disease is likewise fraud. Nikola Tesla thought Einstein was a fraud, and I'd put every dollar in my name on Tesla to win that debate. The inescapable conclusion is that people elevate liars into leadership, and shun truth. The entire Western political scene confirms this. Getting rid of the current leadership changes nothing. Until masses of people take responsibility for their part in creating this mess, there's no solution.
The liars elevate each other knowing there is no one to challenge them until the masses awake.
Exactly. It only works that way because when the liars elevate another liar and put him/her on stage, people cheer. If people threw rotten tomatoes instead, and then chased the liars out of town with a warning to never come back, there would be profound changes very quickly. But sadly, people just won't accept responsibility for who they put in charge, instead pretending they're just victims.
Reminds me of the amazing story of Cheran, Mexico, where the whole population of good people finally had enough of being victims, and armed themselves and chased out the corrupt government and police and the drug cartels, and have been completely self-governed since. It's inspiring. People really can take their lives back from the thieves if they could muster the courage.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/foreign-metal-like-objects-some-appearing-as-graphene-family-superstructures-found-in-94-percent-of-people-who-took-mrna-vaccines-italian-doctors_4702330.html?utm_source=top5noe&utm_campaign=breaking-2022-09-11-one&utm_medium=email&est=0lk7vvSpRIguaTNUpfAiDfw5bEOaW01KWtWZb0dg%2Fanu%2BQZNN5tr0YRzEaHgOfEq
There's something else in the ACS paper that I took note of when I read it quickly a couple weeks ago, and I just went back and reviewed it.
You've probably seen the reports recently of all the embalmers and pathologists pulling huge growths, what they're calling "clots" but look like soft tissue, out of the veins & arteries of dead people?
In the ACS article, check out the section "Biodistribution and Fate of Graphene-Based Materials". Multiple researchers have reported the accumulation of fibroblasts and fibrous collagen growths in GO-contaminated tissues. They report "signs of tissue injury and remodeling, evidenced by collagen deposition (fibrosis)".
This is a glaring suggestion of what those growths are.
Yes I saw this however I believe it was detailing degradable hydrogels. I thought of that as well. It will likely be updated but there was some reason it was not included.
I have a question. Poornima Wagh equated adjuvants with preservatives. My understanding is that according to vaccine developers, adjuvants are placed in certain vaccines in order to provoke the immune system to produce antibodies, but that preservatives are entirely different and that they are included in the vials to prevent microbial growth. Can you clear this up for me? Thanks!
I think she generically linked them. Adjuvants are toxins to elicit the "immune response". Preservatives are also toxins. This is why she linked them. There is no real difference. The preservatives were just shown to kill microbes. Toxins will kill microbes. What is the difference? Likely degree of toxicity. Adjuvants would be more toxic.
Have you seen this group's findings yet?
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22140176-report-from-working-group-of-vaccine-analysis-in-germany
I saw it about a week ago but haven't had time yet to read through it. From a quick glance I'm not seeing any mention of graphene.
Yeah, we'll see. We also have to expect that debunking studies will come out. So we have to be perspicacious.
A Spanish alternative therapist (who I have connected) looked at people affected by Covid 19 vaccines coming to his office with fluorescent lamp and light off the room. He looked at the skin of the patients. He saw blue, red, yellow and white dots on the chest, back, neck, that is, in the areas where there was magnetism. These dots are expelled to the outside. El color varía en función del tamaño de los puntos (puntos cuánticos de grafeno)
Hi. I've read the first third of this article, very well written. I would however challenge the nature of the "clots" being found. You said: "And, the actual scientific evidence also shows that the graphene shots can explain the severe clotting damage seen by embalmers of vaccinated persons better than current popular theories." Mike Adams has a lab that forensically analyzed some of these rubbery "clots" and these obstructions are not made from human tissue components, but from aluminum and other junk that was also found in the injection fluid by prior researchers. https://thereisnopandemic.net/2022/08/23/shocking-white-embalmer-clots-are-self-assembling-circuits-dr-jane-ruby-and-mike-adams/
Also, I've watched a lot of La Quinta Columna and others on the topic of graphene oxide. I don't see how we can infer that they have not found evidence of "mRNA" in the injection fluid from the fact they found lots of graphene oxide. I haven't seen La Quinta or anyone else until Dr. Wagh, flat-out state that there's no mRNA in the shots. If there is none, that would be really good news. But the genetic damage caused by the graphene oxide is a horror story on its own.
There were other studies. See the first post and we are trying to get Juan Garberi's studies, which were on RNA, so we do know.
Do you have a telegram channel??
No I stay off controlled ops outside of this since I am new to Substack. I will likely do something called UTOPIA. It's encrypted private messaging. I am not yet on Telegram. Dorsey owned I think.