Vials subjected to a variety of independent microscopic and spectroscopic observations and analyses have shown little nucleic acid material and lots of graphene oxide.
Dr. Daniel Nagase of Canada did elemental spectroscopy on Pfizer and Moderna and found no detectable nitrogen or phosphorous in those vaccines... an impossibility if they really contained mRNA encased in nanolipids.
This is very interesting, especially in the midst of the Wagh scandal.
First, why are they pretending that looking at salt crystallization in evaporating solution is something new? And second, the images he provides look exactly like I'd expect salt crystallization to look like, and nothing like the GO images that others have published. And why does the paper say nothing about anything else found in the vax samples he was supposedly using? Did he get a sample of covid vax that was pure saline solution?
I think it's quite possible that some of the geometric shapes in some of the amateur microscopic images, which are being called 'computer chips' by some, could reasonably be salt crystals forming. So the paper has some value regarding that. But to suggest that GO looks the same is grossly inaccurate, in my view. I have to question Wakeling's motives.
Excelente recopilación.. el investigador de biología molecular de Argentina se llama Juan Garberi.. el científico de España se llama Pablo Campra.. se ha encontrado GRAFENO en los viales en más de 20 países.. por espectroscopia microraman en Reino Unido.. el dr. Young tiene una posición rara.. Judy mikovits está muy comprometida con el gobierno de EEUU.. en estos días dos científicas de Argentina publicarán investigación con microscopio de fluorescencia y electrónico dónde se confirma la presencia de grafeno y la ausencia de ARN
I thought this document on graphene oxide is interesting and will have to fully read it, but it's a summary of health effects on it. It says there has been little study on it (at least not in mainstream science):
Glad to see more writing on this topic. I've been following it closely too since the first report from La Quinta more than a year ago. That first analysis was admittedly inconclusive, but what it suggested should've touched off a major movement by other groups to do a more thorough independent analysis. It's been stunning to instead see just silence.
I'd also been following Young for decades, and so knew he would look into it, as it's right in his specialty of looking at live blood. I too have no idea why he reported finding virtually no RNA and yet then talks about RNA in the vax, and agree that his long-time statements about the cause of cancer and other diseases is every bit as unproven as what Rockefeller medicine claims. There seems to be a pattern of doctors who wake up to the horrors and lies of Rockefeller medicine and all end up thinking that terrain theory must then be the explanation for all disease. I guess because they can't find any other Western theory, and they don't know enough about how the body works to figure it out on their own, so terrain theory is the default last choice. Definitely not a scientific approach.
I'd like to learn more about the technology behind the claimed mRNA vaccines, partly because I too have not seen a shred of evidence that there's any such thing in the 'covid' clot shots. I didn't believe the whole narrative about the sudden development and mass production of the mRNA shots, partly because I don't believe such a thing could be produced at that scale and still work reliably, and partly because I've known for a long time that the medical/pharmaceutical industry is built upon lies & deception and vaccines have always been primarily a poison concoction. I'm convinced that the toxins have always been the primary active ingredient, and the rest is a con.
I've also been following the work of Stefan Lanka for decades, so I know the extent to which the medical/pharma industry lies and fakes research. Lanka doesn't believe the mRNA story either.
Regarding Wagh, I didn't watch any of the interviews, but based upon what I've read it sounds like she has lied about her credentials. I'm not aware of any research she's released to back up her claims, so the lies is a pretty good reason to dismiss her. Her testing 2000 vials of vax is simply not believable. And if she was really involved in such a major study, why is it a secret. Who were the other members of the "group", and why have they not published their work, especially since she's being called a liar by lots of people? Sorry, but I don't believe her. But I'm not going to write an article calling her a liar, because I just don't know for sure, yet.
I'm interested in an article from you that goes into more detail about the difference between mRNA and modRNA. What is the modRNA, how is it produced, and how does it get into cells and how does it affect the RNA or DNA of a living human cell?
Interesting that you mention Webb's article on about Resilience. I commented on her Telegram channel that I think the reason the CIA is taking over control of producing ingredients for the 'vaccines' is that they're lying about what the ingredients are and therefore must keep the ingredients secret. And I mentioned the graphene oxide. No reply. This topic seems to scare even most of the truthers. The big takeaway from her article, though, is that the pharma industry really has totally merged with the deep state and military.
Just a layman here with questions. Do you know if all the researchers tested vials that were kept at the recommended very low temperature until the contents were tested? I ask because it seems that the temperature has an effect on the viability of mRNA. Also, we have all seen many reports on social media from people who claim to have been victims of a shedding syndrome, most notably the effects on women's periods. This has been attributed to the spike protein spreading from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated and of course not graphene. Effects on the immune system are also not mentioned - another feature supposedly of the mRNA content. I am probably not being fair as your article just addresses what the researches found and is very thorough in that regard. Nonetheless, it left me with those questions (and more but I will stop here).
If these findings are true we need to revise many things about our model from one of bioweapon depopulation to one of outright chemical poisoning. The major smoking gun of course is the lack of any mRNA in the vials. Others have commented on this:
The findings by Wagh are not published for obvious reasons, and neither are the names of the other scientists. Remember, these vials were obtained through 'inside' channels. My opinion on Wagh is she is legit, it would not be that easy to publish this OR publish the names of the scientists, and they are all likely very afraid of being "Noack'ed". She sounds very credible and has much experience as a lab tech, but we are going on pure faith here. A big Kierkegaardian leap.
We cannot tell on the basis of clinical findings if this is true or not, because all of the patient signs and symptoms could just as well be from toxins than any SPs, including the strange fibrotic clots.
If I was eugenicist in all this, I might devise a plan as follows. Fake a virus and invent the need for a so-called vaccine supposedly made of mRNA in LNPs to stimulate Ab production, when in fact it is a chemical poison. You would then have an excuse to jab every arm, which is what they obviously have been trying to do across the world.
In fact to get people off your trail, you could even invent patents for fake SPs, fake lab leaks of fake viruses, fake boosters for added 'protection', and let a bunch of substackers bloviate about the viral theory and write articles about all this when in fact you are chemically poisoning and killing humanity with chemicals like hydrogels, graphene, LNPs and heavy metals.
Sounds like a double agenda: death by jabs by chemical poisoning, and those who survive will be graphene -5G AI slaves.
Keep up the great work, you are in the right rabbit hole.
Just adding another little puzzle piece that I haven't seen anyone else mention anywhere.
Reading the ACS "Safety Assessment of Graphene" paper that i linked in a previous comment, I noticed that researchers have been combining GO with PEG for bio-compatibility studies, calling the PEG a "functionalizing" agent. Reportedly the PEG helps the GO particles pass through cell walls, which they consider an improvement in bio-compatibility.
And of course PEG is one of the listed ingredients in the covid vaxes. Is that a coincidence, or is the PEG in there because they're using rGO functionalized with PEG?
All the researchers checking for SARAS-COV-2 should be given the Nobel Prize if it still exists for - discovering NOTHING.....The greatest medical discovery in Mankind's history was NOTHING.
There's something else in the ACS paper that I took note of when I read it quickly a couple weeks ago, and I just went back and reviewed it.
You've probably seen the reports recently of all the embalmers and pathologists pulling huge growths, what they're calling "clots" but look like soft tissue, out of the veins & arteries of dead people?
In the ACS article, check out the section "Biodistribution and Fate of Graphene-Based Materials". Multiple researchers have reported the accumulation of fibroblasts and fibrous collagen growths in GO-contaminated tissues. They report "signs of tissue injury and remodeling, evidenced by collagen deposition (fibrosis)".
This is a glaring suggestion of what those growths are.
I have a question. Poornima Wagh equated adjuvants with preservatives. My understanding is that according to vaccine developers, adjuvants are placed in certain vaccines in order to provoke the immune system to produce antibodies, but that preservatives are entirely different and that they are included in the vials to prevent microbial growth. Can you clear this up for me? Thanks!
A Spanish alternative therapist (who I have connected) looked at people affected by Covid 19 vaccines coming to his office with fluorescent lamp and light off the room. He looked at the skin of the patients. He saw blue, red, yellow and white dots on the chest, back, neck, that is, in the areas where there was magnetism. These dots are expelled to the outside. El color varía en función del tamaño de los puntos (puntos cuánticos de grafeno)
Hi. I've read the first third of this article, very well written. I would however challenge the nature of the "clots" being found. You said: "And, the actual scientific evidence also shows that the graphene shots can explain the severe clotting damage seen by embalmers of vaccinated persons better than current popular theories." Mike Adams has a lab that forensically analyzed some of these rubbery "clots" and these obstructions are not made from human tissue components, but from aluminum and other junk that was also found in the injection fluid by prior researchers. https://thereisnopandemic.net/2022/08/23/shocking-white-embalmer-clots-are-self-assembling-circuits-dr-jane-ruby-and-mike-adams/
Also, I've watched a lot of La Quinta Columna and others on the topic of graphene oxide. I don't see how we can infer that they have not found evidence of "mRNA" in the injection fluid from the fact they found lots of graphene oxide. I haven't seen La Quinta or anyone else until Dr. Wagh, flat-out state that there's no mRNA in the shots. If there is none, that would be really good news. But the genetic damage caused by the graphene oxide is a horror story on its own.
Dr. Daniel Nagase of Canada did elemental spectroscopy on Pfizer and Moderna and found no detectable nitrogen or phosphorous in those vaccines... an impossibility if they really contained mRNA encased in nanolipids.
Have you seen Robin Wakeling's new paper, just published yesterday?
https://drsambailey.com/covid-vaccines-a-curious-discovery-on-the-graphene-oxide-question/
This is very interesting, especially in the midst of the Wagh scandal.
First, why are they pretending that looking at salt crystallization in evaporating solution is something new? And second, the images he provides look exactly like I'd expect salt crystallization to look like, and nothing like the GO images that others have published. And why does the paper say nothing about anything else found in the vax samples he was supposedly using? Did he get a sample of covid vax that was pure saline solution?
I think it's quite possible that some of the geometric shapes in some of the amateur microscopic images, which are being called 'computer chips' by some, could reasonably be salt crystals forming. So the paper has some value regarding that. But to suggest that GO looks the same is grossly inaccurate, in my view. I have to question Wakeling's motives.
Excelente recopilación.. el investigador de biología molecular de Argentina se llama Juan Garberi.. el científico de España se llama Pablo Campra.. se ha encontrado GRAFENO en los viales en más de 20 países.. por espectroscopia microraman en Reino Unido.. el dr. Young tiene una posición rara.. Judy mikovits está muy comprometida con el gobierno de EEUU.. en estos días dos científicas de Argentina publicarán investigación con microscopio de fluorescencia y electrónico dónde se confirma la presencia de grafeno y la ausencia de ARN
I thought this document on graphene oxide is interesting and will have to fully read it, but it's a summary of health effects on it. It says there has been little study on it (at least not in mainstream science):
https://cdn1.richplanet.net/pdf/0285.pdf
Glad to see more writing on this topic. I've been following it closely too since the first report from La Quinta more than a year ago. That first analysis was admittedly inconclusive, but what it suggested should've touched off a major movement by other groups to do a more thorough independent analysis. It's been stunning to instead see just silence.
I'd also been following Young for decades, and so knew he would look into it, as it's right in his specialty of looking at live blood. I too have no idea why he reported finding virtually no RNA and yet then talks about RNA in the vax, and agree that his long-time statements about the cause of cancer and other diseases is every bit as unproven as what Rockefeller medicine claims. There seems to be a pattern of doctors who wake up to the horrors and lies of Rockefeller medicine and all end up thinking that terrain theory must then be the explanation for all disease. I guess because they can't find any other Western theory, and they don't know enough about how the body works to figure it out on their own, so terrain theory is the default last choice. Definitely not a scientific approach.
I'd like to learn more about the technology behind the claimed mRNA vaccines, partly because I too have not seen a shred of evidence that there's any such thing in the 'covid' clot shots. I didn't believe the whole narrative about the sudden development and mass production of the mRNA shots, partly because I don't believe such a thing could be produced at that scale and still work reliably, and partly because I've known for a long time that the medical/pharmaceutical industry is built upon lies & deception and vaccines have always been primarily a poison concoction. I'm convinced that the toxins have always been the primary active ingredient, and the rest is a con.
I've also been following the work of Stefan Lanka for decades, so I know the extent to which the medical/pharma industry lies and fakes research. Lanka doesn't believe the mRNA story either.
Regarding Wagh, I didn't watch any of the interviews, but based upon what I've read it sounds like she has lied about her credentials. I'm not aware of any research she's released to back up her claims, so the lies is a pretty good reason to dismiss her. Her testing 2000 vials of vax is simply not believable. And if she was really involved in such a major study, why is it a secret. Who were the other members of the "group", and why have they not published their work, especially since she's being called a liar by lots of people? Sorry, but I don't believe her. But I'm not going to write an article calling her a liar, because I just don't know for sure, yet.
I'm interested in an article from you that goes into more detail about the difference between mRNA and modRNA. What is the modRNA, how is it produced, and how does it get into cells and how does it affect the RNA or DNA of a living human cell?
Interesting that you mention Webb's article on about Resilience. I commented on her Telegram channel that I think the reason the CIA is taking over control of producing ingredients for the 'vaccines' is that they're lying about what the ingredients are and therefore must keep the ingredients secret. And I mentioned the graphene oxide. No reply. This topic seems to scare even most of the truthers. The big takeaway from her article, though, is that the pharma industry really has totally merged with the deep state and military.
Look forward to more.
Just a layman here with questions. Do you know if all the researchers tested vials that were kept at the recommended very low temperature until the contents were tested? I ask because it seems that the temperature has an effect on the viability of mRNA. Also, we have all seen many reports on social media from people who claim to have been victims of a shedding syndrome, most notably the effects on women's periods. This has been attributed to the spike protein spreading from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated and of course not graphene. Effects on the immune system are also not mentioned - another feature supposedly of the mRNA content. I am probably not being fair as your article just addresses what the researches found and is very thorough in that regard. Nonetheless, it left me with those questions (and more but I will stop here).
I just reviewed the findings in Wagh's group examination of 2305 vials:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BJqGWMB5uHzI/
here is my SUMMARY:
If these findings are true we need to revise many things about our model from one of bioweapon depopulation to one of outright chemical poisoning. The major smoking gun of course is the lack of any mRNA in the vials. Others have commented on this:
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/want-to-know-whats-inside-the-vaccine
Others found badly damaged mRNA, which would not penetrate cells, and not have any effect, (but could be a subterfuge for toxins also).
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/documents-leaked-from-the-ema-confirms
The findings by Wagh are not published for obvious reasons, and neither are the names of the other scientists. Remember, these vials were obtained through 'inside' channels. My opinion on Wagh is she is legit, it would not be that easy to publish this OR publish the names of the scientists, and they are all likely very afraid of being "Noack'ed". She sounds very credible and has much experience as a lab tech, but we are going on pure faith here. A big Kierkegaardian leap.
We cannot tell on the basis of clinical findings if this is true or not, because all of the patient signs and symptoms could just as well be from toxins than any SPs, including the strange fibrotic clots.
If I was eugenicist in all this, I might devise a plan as follows. Fake a virus and invent the need for a so-called vaccine supposedly made of mRNA in LNPs to stimulate Ab production, when in fact it is a chemical poison. You would then have an excuse to jab every arm, which is what they obviously have been trying to do across the world.
In fact to get people off your trail, you could even invent patents for fake SPs, fake lab leaks of fake viruses, fake boosters for added 'protection', and let a bunch of substackers bloviate about the viral theory and write articles about all this when in fact you are chemically poisoning and killing humanity with chemicals like hydrogels, graphene, LNPs and heavy metals.
Sounds like a double agenda: death by jabs by chemical poisoning, and those who survive will be graphene -5G AI slaves.
Keep up the great work, you are in the right rabbit hole.
Marc Mullie MD
Montreal
Just adding another little puzzle piece that I haven't seen anyone else mention anywhere.
Reading the ACS "Safety Assessment of Graphene" paper that i linked in a previous comment, I noticed that researchers have been combining GO with PEG for bio-compatibility studies, calling the PEG a "functionalizing" agent. Reportedly the PEG helps the GO particles pass through cell walls, which they consider an improvement in bio-compatibility.
And of course PEG is one of the listed ingredients in the covid vaxes. Is that a coincidence, or is the PEG in there because they're using rGO functionalized with PEG?
All the researchers checking for SARAS-COV-2 should be given the Nobel Prize if it still exists for - discovering NOTHING.....The greatest medical discovery in Mankind's history was NOTHING.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/foreign-metal-like-objects-some-appearing-as-graphene-family-superstructures-found-in-94-percent-of-people-who-took-mrna-vaccines-italian-doctors_4702330.html?utm_source=top5noe&utm_campaign=breaking-2022-09-11-one&utm_medium=email&est=0lk7vvSpRIguaTNUpfAiDfw5bEOaW01KWtWZb0dg%2Fanu%2BQZNN5tr0YRzEaHgOfEq
There's something else in the ACS paper that I took note of when I read it quickly a couple weeks ago, and I just went back and reviewed it.
You've probably seen the reports recently of all the embalmers and pathologists pulling huge growths, what they're calling "clots" but look like soft tissue, out of the veins & arteries of dead people?
In the ACS article, check out the section "Biodistribution and Fate of Graphene-Based Materials". Multiple researchers have reported the accumulation of fibroblasts and fibrous collagen growths in GO-contaminated tissues. They report "signs of tissue injury and remodeling, evidenced by collagen deposition (fibrosis)".
This is a glaring suggestion of what those growths are.
I have a question. Poornima Wagh equated adjuvants with preservatives. My understanding is that according to vaccine developers, adjuvants are placed in certain vaccines in order to provoke the immune system to produce antibodies, but that preservatives are entirely different and that they are included in the vials to prevent microbial growth. Can you clear this up for me? Thanks!
Have you seen this group's findings yet?
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22140176-report-from-working-group-of-vaccine-analysis-in-germany
I saw it about a week ago but haven't had time yet to read through it. From a quick glance I'm not seeing any mention of graphene.
A Spanish alternative therapist (who I have connected) looked at people affected by Covid 19 vaccines coming to his office with fluorescent lamp and light off the room. He looked at the skin of the patients. He saw blue, red, yellow and white dots on the chest, back, neck, that is, in the areas where there was magnetism. These dots are expelled to the outside. El color varía en función del tamaño de los puntos (puntos cuánticos de grafeno)
Hi. I've read the first third of this article, very well written. I would however challenge the nature of the "clots" being found. You said: "And, the actual scientific evidence also shows that the graphene shots can explain the severe clotting damage seen by embalmers of vaccinated persons better than current popular theories." Mike Adams has a lab that forensically analyzed some of these rubbery "clots" and these obstructions are not made from human tissue components, but from aluminum and other junk that was also found in the injection fluid by prior researchers. https://thereisnopandemic.net/2022/08/23/shocking-white-embalmer-clots-are-self-assembling-circuits-dr-jane-ruby-and-mike-adams/
Also, I've watched a lot of La Quinta Columna and others on the topic of graphene oxide. I don't see how we can infer that they have not found evidence of "mRNA" in the injection fluid from the fact they found lots of graphene oxide. I haven't seen La Quinta or anyone else until Dr. Wagh, flat-out state that there's no mRNA in the shots. If there is none, that would be really good news. But the genetic damage caused by the graphene oxide is a horror story on its own.
Do you have a telegram channel??